Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755000AbYBYMLW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:11:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754054AbYBYMLM (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:11:12 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190]:44764 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754051AbYBYMLK (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:11:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dyVYREO7TI86eTeWejoWyEnd5hsWAaGAbj7bEoj0AT9UNtoCzOHNc8vQrQWLE83UoWXOhtlUKRlM1Ja71QY/htXLBQasXq8NkZf9HKB0mjS7NZ6kCRx4ESeOgqoJ/fNIRSpPu8ve6mGBgpDebDE+MUCjjEbAoO7E8IiALHqLj8g= Message-ID: <84144f020802250411i7a4a7c51h60ed9f9878c86422@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:11:04 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Michael Buesch" Subject: Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch) Cc: "Greg KH" , "Alexey Zaytsev" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Alexey Zaytsev" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" , "Linus Torvalds" In-Reply-To: <200802251054.57070.mb@bu3sch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47BEAF3B.3080809@protei.ru> <20080225064935.GA20997@kroah.com> <200802251054.57070.mb@bu3sch.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7fdf968cbea22c80 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 751 Lines: 19 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Isn't the resolution Michael is suggesting is, "use the different driver"? > > I have two resolutions. One being: > rmmod b44 > rmmod ssb > modprobe bcm43xx > modprobe b44 > > The other being: Wait for 2.6.25 and use the maintained b43 driver. Neither of which seem like acceptable solutions for a 2.6.23 -> 2.6.24 _regression_. Or maybe I am just too naive to believe Linus' statement on not letting the kernel regress... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/