Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756704AbYBYPwU (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:52:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754507AbYBYPwM (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:52:12 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:45828 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754025AbYBYPwL (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:52:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:31:55 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Dhaval Giani , Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: revert load_balance_monitor() Message-ID: <20080225160155.GC21903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1203942167.6242.142.camel@lappy> <1203949799.4688.9.camel@homer.simson.net> <20080225143518.GA29275@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1203953282.6242.180.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1203953282.6242.180.camel@lappy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 21 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:28:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Vatsa, would it make sense to take just that out, or just do a full > revert? Peter, 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79 and 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729 are related very much. The later changes how cpu load is calculated for the former to work properly. I would suggest we do a full revert for now, until the latency issues are sorted out. -- Regards, vatsa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/