Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:14:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:13:56 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:61957 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:13:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable To: landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 02:25:12 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200201091932.g09JW9A27178@snark.thyrsus.com> from "Rob Landley" at Jan 09, 2002 06:44:52 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Do you want an operating system capable of running real-world code written by > people who know more about their specific problem domain (audio) than about > optimal coding in general, or do you want an operating system intended to > only run well-behaved applications designed and implemented by experts? I want an OS were a reasonably cluefully written audio program works. That to me means aiming at the 1mS latency mark. Which doesn't seem to be needing pre-empt. Beyond a typical 1mS latency you have hardware fun to worry about, and the BIOS SMM code eating you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/