Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:56:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:55:54 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:36031 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:55:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 04:55:38 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Jari Ruusu Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Announcement] linux-2.0.40-rc1 Message-ID: <20020110045538.Z5235@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20020109003424.S5235@khan.acc.umu.se> <3C3CEE53.3B35CCE3@pp.inet.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <3C3CEE53.3B35CCE3@pp.inet.fi>; from jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi on Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:28:51AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:28:51AM +0200, Jari Ruusu wrote: > David Weinehall wrote: > > Hence I'm declaring this the first release candidate for 2.0.40. > > Try it out, please. > > > > 2.0.40-rc1 > [snip] > > o Change array-size from 0 to 1 for (me) > > two arrays in the symbol-table > > in include/linux/module.h > > Please revert above change. It makes struct symbol_table.symbol[] one > entry long, and effectively _kills_ module support. Well, I don't really like the magic used in module.h one bit, but I'll revert this for now. Anyone who could comment on whether usage of [] instead of [0] would be better? [0] seems to have been deprecated in later versions of gcc, so there _has_ to be some legal way of expressing what the kernel wants to do here. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/