Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:07:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:06:53 -0500 Received: from megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp ([131.112.171.110]:41738 "HELO megaela.srvf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:06:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:06:32 +0900 Message-ID: From: GOTO Masanori To: pbadari@us.ibm.com Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk.linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: [PATCH] PAGE_SIZE IO for RAW (RAW VARY) In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:18 +0000 (GMT)" In-Reply-To: <200201092320.g09NK1224012@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.15 (More Than Words) EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 10) (Capitol Reef) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.9 - "Euglena tripteris") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:18 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox wrote: > > I tested with 2 large competing databases, both of them seem to benifit > > significantly from this patch. I tested with 4 different Fiber & SCSI > > adaptors, they all seem to work fine. (only on i386). > > Great. It's just a question, you already said that CPU workloads are significantly down, but would you tell me your workloads and environment? I think it's more worth thinking to improve even for for the normal users' environment nicely... -- gotom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/