Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757737AbYBZI23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:28:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751080AbYBZI2V (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:28:21 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]:51135 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbYBZI2U (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:28:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hArOAjEmYD10PgWRg8nD9eDMvdKFR701ZuBrXsB3JrNBpn0NfGn67hSHsFuafKJBRqUtBovoiZWRBHCEqM/avbImqhpza+Zrldrn9EBJuKVBMGYSmNQGR+MOd4a1TTpXLOEEn7TFZjKWPFaBjIeg/NzSNgnFLS/LquVxDwZBjBI= Message-ID: <6278d2220802260028y7a4a7ac5o568fd1029ef9fd82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:28:18 +0000 From: "Daniel J Blueman" To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Linux Kernel" Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc3] ACPI _PPC limiting processor speed... Cc: "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <20080225154845.2b71c200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6278d2220802251329x75b6d4c5lc3fab6fe6e75363f@mail.gmail.com> <20080225154845.2b71c200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1813 Lines: 52 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:29:24 +0000 "Daniel J Blueman" wrote: > > My 2.2GHz [1] Thinkpad T61 is unable to get past 1.2GHz, seemingly > > because of the _PPC ACPI objects [2]. > > > > Given that the _PPC object is different for both cores, is this more > > of a BIOS bug or an ACPI interpreter problem? The problem was present > > in 2.6.24-rc, 2.6.24 final and since. > > > > BIOS is 7LETA9WW/2.09, so current - would any further information be > > useful for debugging this problem, and would dumping the ACPI tables > > be useful? > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > --- [1] > > > > freq-table: table entry 0: 2201000 kHz, 0 index > > freq-table: table entry 1: 2200000 kHz, 1 index > > freq-table: table entry 2: 1600000 kHz, 2 index > > freq-table: table entry 3: 1200000 kHz, 3 index > > freq-table: table entry 4: 800000 kHz, 4 index > > > > --- [2] > > > > cpufreq-core: CPU 0: _PPC is 3 - frequency limited > > cpufreq-core: CPU 1: _PPC is 0 - frequency not limited > > (cc linux-acpi) > > If nothing happens, please raise a report at bugzilla.kernel.org, thanks. I've raised this into a Bugzilla entry for tracking and history, and dumped ACPI tables in binary and hex formats: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 Let me know of anything else useful. If I get time in the next days, I'll try find a previous working kernel and start bisecting for the regression. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel J Blueman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/