Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764034AbYBZRpT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:45:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763983AbYBZRow (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:44:52 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:38175 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762393AbYBZRos (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:44:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:43:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Nikola Ciprich Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Nick Cheng , Erich Chen , kopi@linuxbox.cz Subject: Re: arcmsr & areca-1660 - strange behaviour under heavy load Message-Id: <20080226094308.35db8f3f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20080224161034.f494fc7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1609 Lines: 47 On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:35:31 +0100 (CET) Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > thanks a lot for reply, I'm attaching requested information. > please let me know if You need more information/testing, whatever. > I'll be glad to help. > BR > nik > > >> Areca support doesn't seem to be very interested in the problem :-( > > > > (cc's added) > > > > Please get the machine into this state of memory exhaustion then take > > copies of the output of the following, and send them via reply-to-all to > > this email: > > > > - cat /proc/meminfo > > > > - cat /proc/slabinfo > > > > - dmesg -c > /dev/null ; echo m > /proc/sysrq-trigger ; dmesg -c > > > > Thanks. Alas, that all looks OK to me. You never get any out-of-memory messages, and no oom-killing messages? Possibly what is happening here is that in this low-memory condition, some of the driver's internal memory-allocation attempts are failing, and the driver isn't correctly handling this. This is a rare situation which may well not have been hit in anyone else's testing. I expect that the Areca engineers will be able to reproduce this with a suitably small "mem=" kernel boot option. If not, they could perhaps investigate the kernel's fault-injection framework, which permits simulation of page allocation failures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/