Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764263AbYBZVOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:14:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753977AbYBZVNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:13:51 -0500 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:25739 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753107AbYBZVNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:13:50 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LOQwc3hBcqvpeV472COVexnMVETsfNQXeZJwmXmQYApBYY31O43wXIir/2k0Y5ftPsbEszF6DwaPr5xL0fDc2M+QqcAPfatns/2ZqdgdOdIwDhK4xhXJjMcgNPziwHjxtYO9sQtGDnjZc7ldV9tIOgykJ22losfLlbwduwXnzRI= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:13:48 +0000 From: "Chris Clayton" To: linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver Cc: ivdoorn@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stefano.brivio@polimi.it, johannes@sipsolutions.net In-Reply-To: <20080226194838.GD3013@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200802252104.32416.chris2553@googlemail.com> <200802261911.39577.chris2553@googlemail.com> <20080226194838.GD3013@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1963 Lines: 52 On 26/02/2008, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:11:39PM +0000, Chris Clayton wrote: > > > Sorry, but that's not the case. I find the same results as without the > > patches. With the parameter set to 'pid', the network connection fails very > > quickly, but with it set to 'simple' I can ping and ftp files to and from my > > laptop as much as I like and the connection stays up. In fact, if anything > > the patches seem to have made the network even more fragile, in that it fails > > almost instantly once I start some network activity ( < 10 pings). > > > > I'm sure this is not the hardware - it works perfectly with Windows XP, with > > 2.6.23.14 plus the out-of-tree rt61 driver from serialmonkey, with the > > in-tree driver from 2.6.24.x and with 2.6.25-rc3 with the mac82011's > > ieee80211_default_rc_algo parameter set to 'simple'. > > > At last! Vindication for insisting that we keep 'simple' around! > Bwahahaha! :-) > It's nice to be able to make someone happy :-) > So, am I to understand that 'pid' works find for you with rtl8180? Yes John, using the rtl8180 driver I get reliable network performance with either 'pid' or 'simple'. With the rt61pci driver, I find that 'simple' provides a reliable network, but 'pid' simply does not work. So keeping 'simple' around gets my vote too. > If so, then I wonder if Stefano and Ivo can help us figure-out > what kind of problem is sensitive to both driver _and_ rate control > algorithm? > And I will help in any way I can, providing diagnostics and trying patches. > Thanks, > > John > > -- > John W. Linville > linville@tuxdriver.com > -- Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/