Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 05:48:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 05:47:50 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:10553 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 05:47:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:47:04 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Jens Axboe Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Benjamin LaHaise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: [PATCH] PAGE_SIZE IO for RAW (RAW VARY) Message-ID: <20020110114704.I3357@inspiron.school.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020109132148.C12609@redhat.com> <200201091928.g09JSdH23535@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> <20020110111825.C3357@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020110112225.S19814@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <20020110112225.S19814@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:22:25AM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:28:39AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > Ben, > > > > > > By any chance do you have a list of drivers that assume this ? > > > What does it take to fix them ? > > > > > > I think Jens BIO changes for 2.5 will fix this problem. But > > > 2.4 needs a solution in this area too. This patch showed > > > significant improvement for database workloads. > > > > I didn't checked the implementation but as far as the blkdev is > > concerned the b_size changes without notification as soon as you 'mkfs > > -b somethingelse' and then mount the fs. So it cannot break as far I can > > tell. The only important thing is that b_size stays between 512 and 4k. > > The concern is/was differently sized buffer_heads in the same request, > ie b_size changing as you iterate through the chunks of one request. ok, I don't expect problems there. It can happen for example if you create a snapshot with 4k and then you switch back the original volume to 1k. the physical volume will get mixed b_size colaesced into the same request. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/