Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:07:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:07:33 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:65220 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:07:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:04:47 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: To: Mark Hahn Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Hahn wrote: > > no wonder, it should be 'nice -n -20 vmstat -n 1'. And you should also do > > I keep a suid setrealtime wrapper around (UNSAFE!) for this kind of use: nice -20 is an equivalent but safe version of the same (if you use my patches). I made priority levels -20 ... -16 to be 'super-high priority', ie. such tasks never expire. (they can still drop above prio -16 if they use up too much CPU time, so they cannot lock up systems accidentally like RT tasks.) So it's in essence a 'admin priority', for super-important shells. I'm using it with great success. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/