Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756137AbYB0QrX@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756137AbYB0QrX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:47:23 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754757AbYB0QrL
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:47:11 -0500
Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.40]:46742 "EHLO
	viefep20-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754576AbYB0QrK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:47:10 -0500
Message-ID: <47C5940F.7080906@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:47:11 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible code
References: <20080216002522.9c4bd0fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47BC982C.7050402@imap.cc> <47BD6072.4000407@trash.net> <47C591B4.7090302@imap.cc>
In-Reply-To: <47C591B4.7090302@imap.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1072
Lines: 23

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 21.02.2008 12:28 schrieb Patrick McHardy:
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ntpdate/3562
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] caller is __nf_conntrack_find+0x9b/0xeb [nf_conntrack]
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] Pid: 3562, comm: ntpdate Not tainted 2.6.25-rc2-mm1-testing #1
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297]  [<c02015b9>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x99/0xb0
>> Could you test whether this patch fixes the netfilter
>> warnings please?
> 
> Bad news: With 2.6.25-rc3, that bug has made it into mainline.
> Good news: Your patch fixes it there, too.

No, its been there since -rc1.

> So I suggest you forward it there as soon as possible.

Already done, should hit upstream soon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/