Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758036AbYB0Tku (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757066AbYB0Tkl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:41 -0500 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]:34176 "EHLO smtp4.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757038AbYB0Tkk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:39:30 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Theodore Tso , Ingo Molnar , Andreas Dilger , sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups Message-ID: <20080227193930.GE29269@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080217081935.GN3848@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080218070439.GG3029@webber.adilger.int> <20080218071229.GA1459@elte.hu> <20080218114936.GM8905@mit.edu> <20080218131209.GB21080@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080218132858.GA12568@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080218132858.GA12568@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1503 Lines: 41 On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:28:58AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > If me resending this old patch collides with something finally getting a > > user this part of my patch shouldn't be applied now (but you might get > > it again in 6 months if it's still unused...). > > > > But generally such conflicts would become visible if "known development > > trees that are intended for mainline" were in -mm. > > It *has* been in -mm, except for periods when akpm has dropped it due > to conflicts due to the "must have an in-tree user" doctrinaire > attitude due to a conflict with the r/o bind patch. OK, that's bad luck. > Did you actually try to do a compile test, or only made sure the patch > would apply? The patch won't collide at application time, but it > would when you compile it.... Yes, I do test compilations of all of my patches. But I don't have an overview of all development trees for all subsystems. > - Ted cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/