Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:46:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:46:35 -0500 Received: from rcum.uni-mb.si ([164.8.2.10]:52490 "EHLO rcum.uni-mb.si") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:46:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:46:19 +0100 From: David Balazic Subject: Re: Simple local DOS To: matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-id: <3C3D9B2B.2DDB72CB@uni-mb.si> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthias Andree (matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de) wrote : > On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, David Balazic wrote: > > > > > log in on some virtual terminal, then run the following line > > in a bourne type shell, like bash : > > > > X 2>&1 | less > > > > A reboot "fixes" it. We want to reach windows level quality on desktop > > after all, don't we ? > > You can also fix that by a remote login, How do I pull a network connection and a terminal out of a hat ? Where do I get the hat ? read : it is a sandalone system. > chvt, how do I start chvt if I have a locked up console system ? > or by just not piping X I didn't do it on purpose to lock up my system and risk FS corruption durin unclean reboot. I was interested in the server output and " 2>&1 | less" is the logical way to do that. I could also "solve" this problem by not running linux. And I can "solve" all gcc bugs by not using gcc. Those are not solutions. Not to me at least. > output into interactive programs. tail -f is a viable workaround -- and tail -f ? what is the difference between : $ X 2>&1 | tail -f and $ X ? > all this is off-topic on linux-kernel, non-root user locked up the console code. console code is part of kernel. it is a kernel topic. > it's your own dumbness that makes > you do these things. Better run kdm, gdm or xdm or something and you're > not having this problem. My own dumbness ? Did you also say that ping-of-death is not a problem ? After all it is just the dumbness of people who send out broken ping packets, no ? And if a computer crashes , businesses lose time and money, you pop up and explain "no it is not really lost money/time, because it was caused by dumbness !". -- David Balazic -------------- "Be excellent to each other." - Bill S. Preston, Esq., & "Ted" Theodore Logan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/