Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758868AbYB0V7f (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:59:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756572AbYB0V71 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:59:27 -0500 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]:43715 "EHLO smtp4.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754835AbYB0V71 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:59:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:58:16 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP Message-ID: <20080227215816.GX29269@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <47C5D32E.8070308@ct.jp.nec.com> <20080227212658.GU29269@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <47C5D693.3030207@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C5D693.3030207@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1791 Lines: 51 On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:30:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:16:30PM -0800, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto >>> >>> X86_HT is used for hyperthreading or multicore on 32-bit. >>> The X86_HT on 64-bit is different from 32-bit, it means hyperthreading only. >>> And X86_HT is not used on 64-bit except from cpu/initel_cacheinfo.c. >>> >>> Unify X86_HT for hyperthreading or multicore. >>> Turn X86_HT on when X86_64 and SMP are enabled. >> >> Please fix it properly instead - fiddling around with it the way you do >> only asks for trouble in the future. >> >> What we need are two different variables for: >> - hyperthreading and >> - multicore > > He does, and calls them SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC respectively. These are the already existing scheduler related variables that are only a part of the X86_HT usages. > It's not particularly clear to me what X86_HT is meant to be used for > anymore at all. grep through the source code and you find it is sometimes used for hyperthreading and sometimes for multicore. I don't care whether X86_HT gets splitted or perhaps even removed, but any change to it should remove the status quo of it having two different semantics. > -hpa cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/