Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761609AbYB1BWu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:22:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752094AbYB1BWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:22:41 -0500 Received: from namei.org ([69.55.235.186]:48265 "EHLO us.intercode.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbYB1BWk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:22:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:22:05 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@us.intercode.com.au To: Dave Quigley cc: hch@infradead.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, bfields@fieldses.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] NFS: Introduce lifecycle management for label attribute. In-Reply-To: <1204159673.24345.15.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> Message-ID: References: <1204144786-3502-1-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <1204144786-3502-9-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <1204159673.24345.15.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 668 Lines: 20 On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Dave Quigley wrote: > > Perhaps introduce a debug configuration option for this code. > > In what way? We can change them to respond to the NFS/NFSD debug > variables that are set through proc, or did you have something else in > mind? I was thinking something along the lines of CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG, but I guess you can also use the NFS debug facilities. -- James Morris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/