Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759572AbYB1LIr (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:08:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755572AbYB1LId (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:08:33 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57312 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758966AbYB1LIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:08:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:09:27 +0100 From: Holger Macht To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Kristen Carlson Accardi Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Register for dock events when the drive is inside a dock station Message-ID: <20080228110927.GA5745@homac.suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Tejun Heo , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Kristen Carlson Accardi References: <20080214124048.GB9708@homac.suse.de> <20080214125615.GD9708@homac.suse.de> <47BC5F44.605@garzik.org> <20080221115305.GB5032@homac.suse.de> <47BE26A0.2040708@gmail.com> <20080226101551.GB10721@homac.suse.de> <47C6804A.50705@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C6804A.50705@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1467 Lines: 35 On Thu 28. Feb - 18:35:06, Tejun Heo wrote: > Holger Macht wrote: > > The hotplug handler is only called if the device is actually inside the > > dock station. If it is not, nothing will happen. I hope that I got your > > question right? > > Yes, right. > > > However, if this would be helpful, it would be easy to add something like > > a am_I_on_dock_station?(...) function to the dock driver. > > Hmm.. as long as the event is only delivered when the device is actually > connected behind dock, I think it's okay. The dock driver also export a is_dock_device(acpi_handle) function, which could be used to make more fine-grained decisions, but it shouldn't be needed here. > Does the attached patch fix the previous undock problem? It now > explicitly tells libata EH to detach the notified devices on > EJECT_REQUEST and wait for EH to complete such that control is returned > to ACPI after all notified devices are actually detached. No it does not. Apparently, it freezes faster (from 1 second down to immediately). Before, it just froze when someone (in this case HAL) tried to access the device. The "echo 1 > undock" call does not even return, so it might have introduced another problem. Regards, Holger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/