Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:15:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:15:47 -0500 Received: from xsmtp.ethz.ch ([129.132.97.6]:33072 "EHLO xfe3.d.ethz.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:15:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3DCBA7.4080802@debian.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:13:11 +0100 From: Giacomo Catenazzi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones CC: Alan Cox , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2002 17:15:16.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[5FB31490:01C199FA] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > >>We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire >>problem space is irrelevant >> > > That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the > enormous black list 8-) > Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table! It is already difficult to maintain the database of CPU. The newer CPUs have name stored directly in CPU and no more in kernel :-( ( This is a call for help: how to write a table CPU - CONFIG_SYMBOL ? Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result will be more correct? Other suggestions? giacomo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/