Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:26:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:26:08 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:31243 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:26:02 -0500 Subject: Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) To: cate@debian.org (Giacomo Catenazzi) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Cc: davej@suse.de (Dave Jones), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C3DCBA7.4080802@debian.org> from "Giacomo Catenazzi" at Jan 10, 2002 06:13:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table! Quite > This is a call for help: how to write a table > CPU - CONFIG_SYMBOL ? > Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but > maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result > will be more correct? You need the family/model information to get the right optimisations. Its often not that the instruction set is different but that the cpu implementation is different that determines the choice. With a couple of exceptions cpu type is actually not too important and accidentally using 486 will make little difference - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/