Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:28:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:28:27 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:60937 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:28:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3DCF1F.4070800@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:27:59 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Giacomo Catenazzi , Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >>Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table! >> > > Quite > > >>This is a call for help: how to write a table >>CPU - CONFIG_SYMBOL ? >>Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but >>maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result >>will be more correct? >> > > You need the family/model information to get the right optimisations. Its > often not that the instruction set is different but that the cpu > implementation is different that determines the choice. With a couple of > exceptions cpu type is actually not too important and accidentally using > 486 will make little difference > Something I'd really like to see would be to split "optimize for..." and "run on..." for CPU type; just like gcc has -mmach= and -march=. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/