Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764036AbYB1UrJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:47:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757111AbYB1Uqx (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:46:53 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:48248 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761266AbYB1Uqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:46:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:45:22 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Roland McGrath Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] core dump: user_regset writeback Message-Id: <20080228124522.3ae08f19.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080227200638.15D092700FD@magilla.localdomain> References: <20080227200638.15D092700FD@magilla.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2283 Lines: 61 On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:06:38 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath wrote: > > This makes the user_regset-based core dump code call user_regset > writeback hooks when available. This is necessary groundwork to > allow IA64 to set CORE_DUMP_USE_REGSET. > > CC: Shaohua Li > Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath > --- > fs/binfmt_elf.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c > index 41a958a..eb7cca3 100644 > --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c > +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c > @@ -1424,6 +1424,18 @@ struct elf_note_info { > int thread_notes; > }; > > +/* > + * When a regset has a writeback hook, we call it on each thread before > + * dumping user memory. On register window machines, this makes sure the > + * user memory backing the register data is up to date before we read it. > + */ > +static void do_thread_regset_writeback(struct task_struct *task, > + const struct user_regset *regset) > +{ > + if (regset->writeback) > + regset->writeback(task, regset, 1); > +} > + > static int fill_thread_core_info(struct elf_thread_core_info *t, > const struct user_regset_view *view, > long signr, size_t *total) > @@ -1445,6 +1457,8 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct elf_thread_core_info *t, > sizeof(t->prstatus), &t->prstatus); > *total += notesize(&t->notes[0]); > > + do_thread_regset_writeback(t->task, &view->regsets[0]); > + > /* > * Each other regset might generate a note too. For each regset > * that has no core_note_type or is inactive, we leave t->notes[i] > @@ -1452,6 +1466,7 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct elf_thread_core_info *t, > */ > for (i = 1; i < view->n; ++i) { > const struct user_regset *regset = &view->regsets[i]; > + do_thread_regset_writeback(t->task, regset); > if (regset->core_note_type && > (!regset->active || regset->active(t->task, regset))) { > int ret; Is there a need for this in 2.6.25? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/