Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754353AbYB2Far (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:30:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751417AbYB2Fag (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:30:36 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:40775 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751359AbYB2Fag (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:30:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:30:14 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation Message-ID: <20080229053014.GA19198@parisc-linux.org> References: <1204180441-8540-5-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-6-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-7-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-8-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-9-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-10-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <1204180441-8540-11-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <20080228071822.GA13571@elte.hu> <20080229003954.GA525@parisc-linux.org> <20080228174349.1da254bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080228174349.1da254bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1141 Lines: 30 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:43:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > err, we'd better tell the arch maintainers than we just deleted all their > sempahore code. ^^ I'm so glad it's not just me who makes that typo. I actually grepped for it before sending the patches out. I did already send it to linux-arch back in January or so. But a reminder won't hurt. > yummy summary: > > 254 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 7827 deletions(-) Yeah, that's quite attractive ;-) > Yes, let's get this into linux-next if poss please. If mainline later > breaks for some architecture, well, we did our best.. It _should_ only be build breakage. I guess we'll see. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/