Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758373AbYB2Kjc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:39:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756154AbYB2KjN (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:39:13 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47111 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755951AbYB2KjM (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:39:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched: allow cpuacct stats to be reset From: Peter Zijlstra To: Paul Menage Cc: Dhaval Giani , vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <6599ad830802290208l6b9d97d1l67e351fc2f9112f7@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080229043242.110741439@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080229043751.555866685@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830802282148g7f309995l450fc15074234cd7@mail.gmail.com> <20080229060435.GB5478@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830802290208l6b9d97d1l67e351fc2f9112f7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:38:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1204281534.6243.75.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1084 Lines: 28 On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 02:08 -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Dhaval Giani > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:48:51PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Dhaval Giani wrote: > > > > > > > > Can I suggest, in order to be more generic, that this patch instead > > > set each CPU's counter to the written value divided by the number of > > > CPUs? (Either forgetting the remainder, or spreading it among the > > > first few CPUs). > > > > > > > This patch is only allowing a reset of the stats. In what sort of a > > situation would one be looking for changing the usage value? > > How about Checkpoint/Restart? Shouldn't that be a kernel side thing? And from the kernel you can put back any value you fancy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/