Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbYB2Mtc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:49:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758336AbYB2MtY (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:49:24 -0500 Received: from the.earth.li ([217.147.81.2]:50059 "EHLO the.earth.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754963AbYB2MtX (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:49:23 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 3386 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:49:23 EST Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:52:57 +0000 From: Simon Huggins To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling Message-ID: <20080229115256.GG24533@paranoidfreak.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: huggie@earth.li, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Attribution: huggie User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1747 Lines: 42 [ Please Cc me on replies ] I had a bug with sdhci which Pierre Ossman looked at for me. In the end essentially the fix was to use HZ=1000 and nothing else. Pierre seemed to think that this was a bug in the scheduler. I'm interested if someone who groks the scheduler could take a look at the mmc/* code and see if it's abusing HZ or if there's anything obviously wrong there. If it's not then perhaps there really is a bug in the scheduler? See http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2008-February/002164.html http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2008-January/002142.html Here's the log that caused him to suspect the scheduler: http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002086.html and his post saying so: http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002087.html Originally I tried to narrow it down: http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-November/002072.html and shows a commit that seemed to "fix" it for me http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-November/002072.html but apparently the commit I reverted was good http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-November/002078.html I'm happy to provide more information or try different kernels/config options etc (I really should upgrade the kernel on my laptop anyway). Thanks, -- ----------( "An excellent suggestion sir, with only two )---------- Simon ----( minor flaws...." - Kryten )---- Nomis Htag.pl 0.0.22 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/