Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:55:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, ego@in.ibm.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
       Ted Tso <tytso@us.ibm.com>, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
       Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, bunk@kernel.org,
       Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291330590.2723@scrub.home>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802290853560.8804@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References: <20071213170348.GA25981@in.ibm.com> <20071213171658.GE25981@in.ibm.com>
 <200802290534.57040.zippel@linux-m68k.org> <20080229045328.GA18687@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291330590.2723@scrub.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 24


On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> I'd suggest to move PREEMPT_RCU back to Kconfig.preempt and if you really
> need the second symbol leave this behind (maybe with a comment):
>
> config CLASSIC_RCU
> 	def_bool !PREEMPT_RCU

Ah, OK, you are saying that we should only show the option for
PREEMPT_RCU? If selected, we use that and if not, we default to
CLASSIC_RCU.

I guess that can work.

-- Steve

>
> Once there are more options, we can still look for a better place...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/