Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933754AbYB2UAy (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:00:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752880AbYB2UAp (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:00:45 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55813 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161AbYB2UAo (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:00:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:00:12 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ian Campbell Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexander van Heukelum , Alexander van Heukelum , Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Mark McLoughlin , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC] use realmode code to reserve end-of-conventional-memory to 1MB Message-ID: <20080229200012.GC21494@elte.hu> References: <20080224174605.GA21661@mailshack.com> <47C22568.1010405@zytor.com> <1203958478.20033.1239002461@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20080225170134.GA15839@elte.hu> <20080225180750.GA31054@mailshack.com> <20080228131341.GA25213@mailshack.com> <20080228132822.GA25278@mailshack.com> <1204233131.28798.12.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <47C72432.3010606@zytor.com> <1204240609.28798.33.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1204240609.28798.33.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 22 * Ian Campbell wrote: > Agreed, I think it's pure luck that Xen kernels have gotten away with > it in the past. > > The patch below seems like the right thing to do. It certainly boots > in a domU without the DMI problem (without any of the other related > patches such as Alexander's). > > However ddcprobe hangs when run -- need to investigate some more, vm86 > in general works ok (i.e. my vm86 test code passes). looks good to me - please resend with a note to add it to x86.git once you are happy with it. Seems like 2.6.25 material as well. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/