Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753539AbYCBHDT (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:03:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751953AbYCBHDF (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:03:05 -0500 Received: from wine.ocn.ne.jp ([122.1.235.145]:53817 "EHLO smtp.wine.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751866AbYCBHDE (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:03:04 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: How do arch/ppc and arch/powerpc differ? From: Tetsuo Handa Message-Id: <200803021602.EGJ81261.OJtOFVQFFHOSLM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.50 PL2] X-Accept-Language: ja,en Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:02:56 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 23 Hello. According to Documentation/SubmitChecklist, ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking. I've just set up cross compiling environment for ppc64 using "crossdev -t ppc64" on Gentoo 2007.0 environment. Now I'm trying to modify Makefile to build kernel for ppc64. I've got a question here. ARCH ?= powerpc CROSS_COMPILE ?= powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu- Which keyword ("ppc" or "powerpc") do I need to set for ARCH to do cross-compilation checking? How do they differ? Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/