Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755368AbYCBPnF (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:43:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752244AbYCBPmx (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:42:53 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:2354 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752440AbYCBPmx (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:42:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:40:31 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: huggie@earth.li, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling Message-ID: <20080302104031.GB3861@ucw.cz> References: <20080229115256.GG24533@paranoidfreak.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080229115256.GG24533@paranoidfreak.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 24 On Fri 2008-02-29 11:52:57, Simon Huggins wrote: > [ Please Cc me on replies ] > > I had a bug with sdhci which Pierre Ossman looked at for me. > > In the end essentially the fix was to use HZ=1000 and nothing else. > Pierre seemed to think that this was a bug in the scheduler. > > I'm interested if someone who groks the scheduler could take a look at > the mmc/* code and see if it's abusing HZ or if there's anything > obviously wrong there. If it's not then perhaps there really is a bug > in the scheduler? Is mmc slow or does it just break down? Slow would be expected, but breaking down should be fixed in MMC, too... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/