Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759326AbYCBVU1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:20:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756835AbYCBVUK (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:20:10 -0500 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.185]:53095 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756711AbYCBVUJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:20:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=lDcKqzPA8nyVHvYNIf4mTWJkFekaom48emyvE2/wpqtKdXmOM+Qxd7dKPdp6Cqxlf2zz1LuNBbAGBSj7mEX9k+eM7ls/CMa8GNkNYTwDSA2B4uMfFmgW/7bXJk7gXSzlVMrXtCocDGwNQbateocSnHNdYQBYoMCwkqpZIfzjPaM= Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:19:53 +0100 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_write_request Message-ID: <20080302211953.GD4836@gollum.tnic> Reply-To: petkovbb@gmail.com Mail-Followup-To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1204361928-30229-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <1204361928-30229-3-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200803021933.06012.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200803021933.06012.bzolnier@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) From: Borislav Petkov Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4594 Lines: 108 On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:33:05PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 01 March 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Instead of plugging the request into the pipeline, queue it straight on the > > device's request queue through idetape_queue_rw_tail(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > > --- > > drivers/ide/ide-tape.c | 81 ++--------------------------------------------- > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c > > index 792c76e..abf3efa 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c > > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c > > @@ -2123,12 +2123,6 @@ static int idetape_queue_rw_tail(ide_drive_t *drive, int cmd, int blocks, > > > > debug_log(DBG_SENSE, "%s: cmd=%d\n", __func__, cmd); > > > > - if (test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags)) { > > - printk(KERN_ERR "ide-tape: bug: the pipeline is active in %s\n", > > - __func__); > > - return (0); > > - } > > - > > idetape_init_rq(&rq, cmd); > > rq.rq_disk = tape->disk; > > rq.special = (void *)bh; > > @@ -2140,10 +2134,9 @@ static int idetape_queue_rw_tail(ide_drive_t *drive, int cmd, int blocks, > > if ((cmd & (REQ_IDETAPE_READ | REQ_IDETAPE_WRITE)) == 0) > > return 0; > > > > - if (tape->merge_stage) > > - idetape_init_merge_stage(tape); > > if (rq.errors == IDETAPE_ERROR_GENERAL) > > return -EIO; > > + > > return (tape->blk_size * (blocks-rq.current_nr_sectors)); > > } > > These two changes to idetape_queue_rw_tail() don't look correct > as the pipeline mode is still used by read requests. Wrt first hunk read rq pipeline functionality is removed in the following patch. Would it then be better to merge the two patches? Actually, do we need to keep the driver functional in between the patches of those series for the purposes of git bisection or only compile-testing it is enough? Cause after applying the whole series you get pipelined mode ripped out anyway and intermittent states with partially functional pipeline are of no importance, no? Wrt the second one you're right, this one should stay in for now until tape->merge_stage has been removed. > > @@ -2210,81 +2203,15 @@ static void idetape_wait_first_stage(ide_drive_t *drive) > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tape->lock, flags); > > } > > > > -/* > > - * Try to add a character device originated write request to our pipeline. In > > - * case we don't succeed, we revert to non-pipelined operation mode for this > > - * request. In order to accomplish that, we > > - * > > - * 1. Try to allocate a new pipeline stage. > > - * 2. If we can't, wait for more and more requests to be serviced and try again > > - * each time. > > - * 3. If we still can't allocate a stage, fallback to non-pipelined operation > > - * mode for this request. > > - */ > > +/* Queue up a character device originated write request. */ > > static int idetape_add_chrdev_write_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int blocks) > > { > > idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data; > > - idetape_stage_t *new_stage; > > - unsigned long flags; > > - struct request *rq; > > > > debug_log(DBG_CHRDEV, "Enter %s\n", __func__); > > > > - /* Attempt to allocate a new stage. Beware possible race conditions. */ > > - while ((new_stage = idetape_kmalloc_stage(tape)) == NULL) { > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&tape->lock, flags); > > - if (test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags)) { > > - idetape_wait_for_request(drive, tape->active_data_rq); > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tape->lock, flags); > > - } else { > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tape->lock, flags); > > - idetape_plug_pipeline(drive); > > - if (test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, > > - &tape->flags)) > > - continue; > > Can all the above code be safely removed (are you sure that there are no > hidden interactions)? Even if so I would prefer that it is left intact by > this patch to ease the review. This code does exactly what the comment above explains: it tries to free the pipeline for yet another request by plugging it with the already queued ones and if it can't do so it simply queues the request in non-pipelined mode. What the patch does is remove the plugging and waiting. If we leave this intact we'll be missing the point of the whole exercise. -- Regards/Gru?, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/