Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:14:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:14:43 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:27663 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:14:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions. To: Ronald.Wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Ronald Wahl) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Ronald Wahl" at Jan 11, 2002 01:08:39 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > hard to get emulations right. I grant that this wasn't helped by the fact > > the gcc x86 folks also couldnt read the pentium pro manual correctly. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > What do you mean with this? Explain, please! gcc told to generate i686 binaries uses cmov unconditionally. The intel PPro handbook explicitly says that cmov must be checked for. > myself but I have also some older machines here that have a k6 or a > pentium. For mistake I installed the wrong rpm and had a non working > system. An emulation for such cases would be a _real_ feature at least So you have a buggy rpm program. Get the rpm program fixed so it correctly stops you from doing that. Alan -- If my call is so important to you why don't you hire some more people to answer the telephone? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/