Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753580AbYCCFqk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:46:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750921AbYCCFqb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:46:31 -0500 Received: from n5.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.127.237]:41521 "HELO n5.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750834AbYCCFqa (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:46:30 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 314 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:46:30 EST X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 649811.1634.bm@omp408.mail.mud.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=4BwbjqBktplbdOpFY60xadzidZ3v1zDdNe46P8rDDIJumYjZu625mYMF7gBnUVqq6TnFL04T0scRB1uIvUVCjEBfdNZDbq+EsV7a9OGWXz7bSKuEpcDA6Ae5Vag420c4nY6IX1AMP3cEFc6W+1sr1DNI5CnQMq95Ja1eAu1vxeA= ; X-YMail-OSG: .xsAPO4VM1lw7gGAW1TyQ9jqSoSTxdKemk1.0PC6NxWART5I2oWqYB0WERTgB3KVnb_xZUNCtw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:32:47 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: "Rick van Rein" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080302134221.GA25196@phantom.vanrein.org> <2f11576a0803020901n715fda8esbfc0172f5a15ae3c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2f11576a0803020901n715fda8esbfc0172f5a15ae3c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803031632.47888.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 20 On Monday 03 March 2008 04:01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > in general, > Agreed with we need bad memory treatness. > > > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */ > > some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory. > Why do you want introduce new page flag? > for show_mem() improvement? I'd like to get rid of PG_reserved at some point. So I'd rather not overload it with more meanings ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/