Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:49:16 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
       "KOSAKI Motohiro" <m-kosaki@ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
       "Rick van Rein" <rick@vanrein.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200803031835.03082.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
References: <20080303161025.1E7E.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <200803031835.03082.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Message-Id: <20080303184453.1E8C.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 633
Lines: 19

> > as far as I know, IA64 already use PG_reserved for bad memory.
> > please see arch/ia64/kernel/mcs_drv.c#mca_page_isolate.
> >
> > Doesn't it works on ia64 if your patch introduce?
> 
> It doesn't really need to use PG_reserved there, no. It could
> use PG_bad for that instead.

unfortunately that feature already merged to mainline.
and i am not its developer, sorry ;)

- kosaki


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/