Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:48:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:48:17 -0500 Received: from nrg.org ([216.101.165.106]:58162 "EHLO nrg.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:48:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:47:45 -0800 (PST) From: Nigel Gamble Reply-To: nigel@nrg.org To: Alan Cox cc: Rob Landley , Andrew Morton , Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > The fun below 1mS comes from > > 1. APM bios calls where the bios decides to take >1mS to have > a chat with your batteries > 2. Video cards pulling borderline legal PCI tricks to get > better benchmarketing by stalling the entire bus Don't forget the embedded space, where the hardware vendor can ensure that their hardware is well-behaved. Even on a PC, it is possible for someone who cares about realtime to spec a reasonable system. On good hardware, we can easily do much better than 1ms latency with a preemptible kernel and a spinlock cleanup. I don't think the limitations of some PC hardware should limit our goals for Linux. Nigel Gamble nigel@nrg.org Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/