Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:18:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:18:13 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:20355 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:18:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:17:13 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020110.191713.48532251.davem@redhat.com> To: "ChristianK."@t-online.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Briging doesn't compile without TCP/IP Networking From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <16On3u-1zr9mqC@fwd05.sul.t-online.com> In-Reply-To: <16On3u-1zr9mqC@fwd05.sul.t-online.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "ChristianK."@t-online.de (Christian Koenig) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:50:45 +0100 I accidently destroyed the Kernel of my self made bridge (old 486 / 4 PCI nics). When i tried to compile an new one (2.4.17) I've got a compile error in include/net/tcp_ecn.h Is this patch suitable or could you tell me why unix sokets and others need tcp.h ? It is better to conditionalize or remove the include than to add CONFIG_INET ifdefs to a TCP header :-) I thought I had fixed this in current kernels... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/