Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:42:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:42:27 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:13321 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:42:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:42:03 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Pavel Machek Cc: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" , Daniel Tuijnman , Subject: Re: Memory management problems in 2.4.16 In-Reply-To: <20020110224036.GA32522@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > 8MB should be enough. I was running 2.4.0-test7 on 8MB machine with no > swap, because it had no disk to swap to. I've been running a few hours of low memory testing with my rmap VM and it's holding up fine. The system is still responsive when the amount of pageable RAM is down to about 400 kB ;)) cheers, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/