Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760485AbYCCRkw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:40:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756224AbYCCRfl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:35:41 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:41157 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755556AbYCCRfi (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:35:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GI4jP/lnDxNbh265uruvykJ389nBOxpyENU/pcURMcJEPZxlTtq3mmE6jsBgYd029opZcSSpj7/Ufgw4N6UHvPwV8Z7ZENsVRkEXn2iiCxjSP5/xiONeRmraMkPX4x0LQvadWh9Ik0NkWhs3Aj3UWf67cdOqIUdND3s+3nhs2HQ= Message-ID: <5d6222a80803030935x69fa6e3cv2c6d3afdf9017b98@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:35:36 -0300 From: "Glauber Costa" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/52] First attempt at smp integration Cc: "Glauber Costa" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: <20080303172215.GA7918@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1204564400-17636-1-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <20080303172215.GA7918@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1579 Lines: 43 On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Glauber Costa wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This series of patches does a first attempt at smp integration (I call > > it first, although I don't believe it's too far away from a real one). > > The series comprises 52 patches, and the full diffstat says in the > > end: > > > > 34 files changed, 1858 insertions(+), 2344 deletions(-) > > > > smp_32.c and smp_64.c are completely gone. smp.h and smpboot_{32,64}.c > > are not, although substantially reduced. I know that ideally, no > > leftovers are wanted, but the series were already big enough (I tried > > to split the patches as much as I could), so I considered this a good > > cutting point. If this is all agreed upon and merged, I'll start > > looking at the other bits that are left. > > > > All patches are tested is various random x86 subarchitectures, and all > > of them works. The result also boots fine in mine x86_64 and i386 > > boxes. > > wow, really nice work and the result looks awesome! I'll put this into > x86.git and see how it goes. > > Ingo > Thanks ingo. I'll hook up to the next part as soon as I can. -- Glauber Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/