Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763425AbYCDDaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 22:30:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758098AbYCDD3z (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 22:29:55 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:5731 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751323AbYCDD3y (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 22:29:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=B4A7qPIR3UuL+SMJbnfBk9FhF4a0za+ukLB7Uqp9fruNRFznDbPs40wRiVuIEycbeckq5T3mbPAfDdeZUVMktr5SfjCh1F8ubO+Mkk32n1FrRYaweOFADuDrFKR34P8XCcbSje+1nA9ODmJfqKcRypQDvUgrQT0E51+kpIsxveI= Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH] media: replace remaining __FUNCTION__ occurences From: Harvey Harrison To: Michael Krufky Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org" , LKML , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <37219a840803031928l79395c78ka64192f4a9f61744@mail.gmail.com> References: <1204588990.22933.28.camel@brick> <37219a840803031928l79395c78ka64192f4a9f61744@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:29:54 -0800 Message-Id: <1204601394.22933.99.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1178 Lines: 30 On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 22:28 -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Harvey Harrison > wrote: > > __FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ > > > > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison > > 162 files changed, 892 insertions(+), 892 deletions(-) > > > If we apply this, can it be broken down into several smaller patches? > I am in the midst of a large overhaul of the tuning subsystem, and if > this all gets applied at once, it will wreck havoc on my pending > changesets. > > Other than that, I'm fine with this change if that's what we're doing > across the rest of the kernel... Would just be easier to deal with if > it could be further broken down by subdirectory. No worries on my part, point me at what tree you'd like it against, and how you'd like it broken up. Or just give me a shout when it is most convenient to send an update. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/