Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760598AbYCDROB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:14:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751582AbYCDRNx (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:13:53 -0500 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.233]:2055 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753840AbYCDRNw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:13:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N1ryUoZ2SkDrMLMiuCzdE+gmNUhfkMW6Yu+y596tQQVkFksw1IPxu/JoHf7Bk+TSYBj7rVLOlrDxG3F/8/PzknKtr2AyHV78Pmb9RgtDlIbvn+wxpIv1AkwAMpSi49O2DYzYhMdU2Eg7vJbX3h/BomNOAoZUMiPiCPgCyYHtuc8= Message-ID: <226dee610803040913h4718b61r4310fa78938bc386@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:43:50 +0530 From: "JoJo jojo" To: "Dave Airlie" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc3 + RS690 + DRM + xf86-video-ati hang Cc: "Jonathan McDowell" , "Andrew Morton" , xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080301193511.GP9009@earth.li> <20080303224830.28e98b2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080304085155.GX9009@earth.li> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2084 Lines: 58 Is 128 MB some sort of a sweet spot for ram allocated to gpu ? (hard coded?) First Alex suggested that, & now you. (asking 'coz i used 256 MB while testing) -JoJo On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Is xf86-driver-ati 6.8.0 not a proper release? I'm pretty sure the > > combination of that, 2.6.25-rc3 and CONFIG_DRM_RADEON causes my machine > > to become unresponsive. I only tried a git build of the driver after the > > released version was causing issues. > > Yes we made a mistake with 6.8.0 enabling DRI on rs680 chips before we > knew it worked for everyone, I may be still able to fix this in the kernel > but there is a good chance that it'll require a 6.8.1 userspace, I can't > do anything else about it.. > > Jonathan I appreciate the bug report, I'm more saying to Andrew that > getting DRI right on new chipsets is non-trivial as there are lot of > configurations we can't test until we actually push the code to users.. > and in this case you are one of those.. > > you might try setting the VRAM in your BIOS to 128MB instead of Auto and > seeing it helps.. > > I'll be trying to fix the problem properly quite soon. > > The correct workaround is to add Option "DRI" "Off" to xorg.conf or for me > to travel back in time and unrelease 6.8.0. Removing the kernel DRI > support will just break lots of working systems. > > Dave. > > > > > > Replacing 2.6.25-rc3 with 2.6.24 (still with CONFIG_DRM_RADEON enabled) > > results in a machine that boots to GDM successfully. Likewise if I > > disable CONFIG_DRM_RADEON in 2.6.25-rc3 the machine boots to GDM ok. > > > > J. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > xorg-driver-ati mailing list > xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org > http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/