Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763174AbYCDRx4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:53:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755875AbYCDRxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:53:47 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:50468 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753571AbYCDRxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:53:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:53:46 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: David Brownell cc: Pierre Ossman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , Zdenek Kabelac , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Bugs in MMC [was: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted] In-Reply-To: <200803040144.09601.david-b@pacbell.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 16 On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote: > Or, as pointed out elsewhere, well-behaved MMC hosts ... which don't > need either such reprobing or the associated remove-on-suspend. I don't understand this comment. Suppose a card was inserted while the system was hibernating. If the core didn't reprobe, when would that card be discovered? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/