Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762303AbYCDVBE (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:01:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755642AbYCDVAw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:00:52 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:49114 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753932AbYCDVAw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:00:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:00:51 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: David Brownell cc: Pierre Ossman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , Zdenek Kabelac , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Bugs in MMC [was: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted] In-Reply-To: <200803041230.42152.david-b@pacbell.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 755 Lines: 20 On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote: > > What's wrong with a superfluous probe at resume time, besides the waste > > of a few milliseconds? > > I'm more concerned with the undesirable removal of devices at suspend > time ... ones with mounted filesystems etc. On that we can agree. The removal is done if the host doesn't define a resume method. There doesn't seem to be any point to that, given that the probing during resume will determine whether a card has in fact been removed. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/