Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934288AbYCEBnr (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:43:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757452AbYCEBnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:43:05 -0500 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:52639 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751824AbYCEBnE (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:43:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:42:20 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Lee Schermerhorn Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <1204643158.5338.5.camel@localhost> References: <20080304192441.1EA2.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1204643158.5338.5.camel@localhost> Message-Id: <20080305103545.1EAE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.42 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 28 > > > +config NORECLAIM > > > + bool "Track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" > > > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT > > > > as far as I remembered, somebody said CONFIG_NORECLAIM is easy confusable. > > may be.. > > > > IMHO insert "lru" word is better. > > example, > > > > config NORECLAIM_LRU > > bool "Zone LRU of track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" > > depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT > > OK. But, I'd suggest the 'bool' description be something like: > > config NORECLAIM_LRU > bool "Add LRU list to track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)" That's nice. thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/