Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762010AbYCECZn (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:25:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752134AbYCECZd (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:25:33 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:64902 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751431AbYCECZc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:25:32 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,444,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="349949775" Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked when cpu is set to offline From: Yi Yang Reply-To: yi.y.yang@intel.com To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Gautham R Shenoy , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <20080304150107.GA564@tv-sign.ru> References: <1204483329.3607.8.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com> <20080303153154.GA11288@in.ibm.com> <1204555505.3842.4.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com> <20080304052613.GA28632@in.ibm.com> <20080304150107.GA564@tv-sign.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:37:23 +0800 Message-Id: <1204641443.3842.46.camel@yangyi-dev.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5724 Lines: 156 On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 18:01 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 03/04, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > > > So at times, the callback thread is blocked on kthread_stop(k) in > > softlockup.c, while other time, it was blocked in > > cleanup_workqueue_threads() in workqueue.c. > > From another message: > > > > However, it remains in R< state > > What about cwq->thread? Was it TASK_RUNNING too? > > Perhaps, for some reason the task can't get CPU after migrating from > the now dead CPU. > > I can't reproduce this problem on my one cpu P4-ht, perhaps you can > try something like the untested/uncompiled patch below? You need one multiprocessor system to regenerate, 4 CPUs or more are best. At the beginning, i thought Detect Soft Lockups (CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP) is culprit because it added much code to detect lock dependencies and deadlocks, but the issue is still there after i disabled soft lock detection, it can be regenerated but will take much long time. At this time, group_balance and kblockd are in "R<" state. [root@harwich-rh ~]# ps aux | grep kstop root 15466 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15467 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15468 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15469 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15470 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15471 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15472 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15473 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15474 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15475 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 15476 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z< 01:03 0:00 [kstopmachine] root 17155 0.0 0.0 61148 708 pts/3 R+ 14:47 0:00 grep kstop [root@harwich-rh ~]# ps aux | grep "R<" root 35 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? R< Mar13 0:00 [group_balance] root 182 0.1 0.0 0 0 ? R< Mar13 1:09 [kblockd/0] root 17157 0.0 0.0 61148 704 pts/3 R+ 14:47 0:00 grep R< [root@harwich-rh ~]# > Oleg. > > --- include/linux/sched.h 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300 > +++ include/linux/sched.h 2008-03-04 17:44:53.136738605 +0300 > @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ struct task_struct { > /* hung task detection */ > unsigned long last_switch_timestamp; > unsigned long last_switch_count; > + unsigned long xxx; > #endif > /* CPU-specific state of this task */ > struct thread_struct thread; > --- kernel/fork.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300 > +++ kernel/fork.c 2008-03-04 17:45:14.773033839 +0300 > @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process( > #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP > p->last_switch_count = 0; > p->last_switch_timestamp = 0; > + p->xxx = 0; > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT > --- kernel/sched.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300 > +++ kernel/sched.c 2008-03-04 17:48:42.308798646 +0300 > @@ -1291,6 +1291,7 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, > sched_info_queued(p); > p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, wakeup); > p->se.on_rq = 1; > + p->xxx = jiffies | 1; > } > > static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep) > @@ -3944,6 +3945,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible: > preempt_enable_no_resched(); > if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED))) > goto need_resched; > + > + current->xxx = 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule); > > --- kernel/softlockup.c 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300 > +++ kernel/softlockup.c 2008-03-04 17:49:05.584414763 +0300 > @@ -174,6 +174,27 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_ > touch_nmi_watchdog(); > } > > +static void check_running_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now) > +{ > + if (!sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) > + return; > + > + if (time_before(now, t->xxx + HZ * sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) > + return; > + > + printk(KERN_ERR "INFO: task %s:%d can't get CPU for more than " > + "%ld seconds.\n", t->comm, t->pid, > + sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs); > + > + if (!cpus_intersects(t->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map)) > + printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpus_allowed\n"); > + if (!cpu_online(task_cpu(t))) > + printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpu\n"); > + > + sched_show_task(t); > + touch_nmi_watchdog(); > +} > + > /* > * Check whether a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE does not get woken up for > * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out > @@ -183,6 +204,7 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t > { > int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count; > unsigned long now = get_timestamp(this_cpu); > + unsigned long jiff = jiffies; > struct task_struct *g, *t; > > /* > @@ -192,15 +214,17 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t > if ((tainted & TAINT_DIE) || did_panic) > return; > > - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); > + rcu_read_lock(); > do_each_thread(g, t) { > if (!--max_count) > goto unlock; > if (t->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) > check_hung_task(t, now); > + if (!t->xxx) > + check_running_task(t, jiff); > } while_each_thread(g, t); > unlock: > - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > } > > /* > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/