Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756911AbYCED5J (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:57:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750946AbYCED44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:56:56 -0500 Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.147]:60532 "EHLO tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbYCED4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:56:55 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 3224 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:56:55 EST To: kyle@mcmartin.ca Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, tomof@acm.org, kyle@parisc-linux.org, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] fix iommu segment boundary problems (parisc) From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <20080302171311.GB18883@phobos.i.cabal.ca> References: <1204438228-4564-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080302171311.GB18883@phobos.i.cabal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20080305125415Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:54:15 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 20040704(IM147) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 26 On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 12:13:11 -0500 Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:10:25PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > This patchset is another sequel to my patchset to fix iommu segment > > boundary problems, IOMMUs allocate memory areas without considering a > > low level driver's segment boundary limits: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg11919.html > > > > This looks fine. Are you able to test this? If not, we can set you up > with an account on a machine with remote console and all that jazz, if > you'd like to. Thanks for the offer! I don't have any parisc hardware. If -mm kernels are tested well with parisc, I'd be happy to leave it in your guys' hands since I've never used parisc and the patches seem to work (with the bug fix for 32bits boxes). I'd like to try if there are not people who try -mm kernels with parisc or a bug that I can't fix easily will be found. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/