Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:59:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:59:26 -0500 Received: from sal.qcc.sk.ca ([198.169.27.3]:49421 "HELO sal.qcc.sk.ca") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:59:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 08:29:04 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: silly [< >] and other excess Message-ID: <20001123082904.B1485@qcc.sk.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Charles Cazabon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:24:02AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > Thats because too many things get put on a line then. > > And because we do [] [] not [][] ? > > In the good old times we had foo bar for a total of 8*(8+1) = 72 > positions. Now we have [] [] which takes 8*(8+1+4) = 104 > positions. If you turned this into 6 items per line instead of 8, > it would certainly improve matters a bit. The original poster complained the output lines were too wide for the screen on his PC. Perhaps he should change his console mode to 132 characters wide (via SVGATextMode or such) -- voila, no more problem, no broken kernel patches. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer. -------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/