Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:27:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@gmail.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter
Message-ID: <20080306102712.GE13391@elte.hu>
References: <200803060001.38432.paplociennik@gmail.com> <47CF79E4.3030107@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47CF79E4.3030107@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 740
Lines: 22


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> Pawel Plociennik wrote:
>> Hi Andrew and other *real* hackers,
>>
>> I have sent a *last* version of a patch which it has added a new kernel parameter chroot=
>> It were discusioned a *long time* on a lkml so I hope that it will has been applied.
>
> It has been discussed and *rejected* a large number of times.
>
> This is completely useless bloat.

why is it useless? Would it be more acceptable were it made dependent on 
a .config option?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/