Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763537AbYCFKzc (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:55:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761327AbYCFKzM (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:55:12 -0500 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.182]:55783 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761108AbYCFKzI (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:55:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=lfeRt+kA+lK9Ldffbdr7iqEkQas/vpGANwvy1QdLGorUMT+BG3OEfM61SZMFb/WENAP4S7OelZmdhr9z+w9tq7wq9vnEut4acNiCcurB0XeoHjgN3iIZj68jzBsFfoZ3enPw8yXnQfMPuqgLb/Hdd8scTpRtrkyA0lJxGb+lfLU= From: Pawel Plociennik To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:54:50 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200803060001.38432.paplociennik@gmail.com> <47CF79E4.3030107@zytor.com> <20080306102712.GE13391@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080306102712.GE13391@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803061154.51724.paplociennik@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 27 On Thursday 06 March 2008 05:27, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > Pawel Plociennik wrote: > >> Hi Andrew and other *real* hackers, > >> > >> I have sent a *last* version of a patch which it has added a new kernel parameter chroot= > >> It were discusioned a *long time* on a lkml so I hope that it will has been applied. > > > > It has been discussed and *rejected* a large number of times. > > > > This is completely useless bloat. > > why is it useless? Would it be more acceptable were it made dependent on > a .config option? > > Ingo > I think that use it as a .config option is a nonsense because it nothing to do if chroot= parameter has not been used in a booting time. However as I said before I have *left* this patch and I am not interesting in that now :-( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/