Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761572AbYCFMDw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:03:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750986AbYCFMDo (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:03:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39009 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbYCFMDm (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:03:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Ingo Molnar X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: Jan Beulich , tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix typo(?) in step.c In-Reply-To: Ingo Molnar's message of Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:28:19 +0100 <20080306112819.GC17906@elte.hu> References: <47CE69B0.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20080305134150.GA16477@elte.hu> <20080306075223.BA28B2700FD@magilla.localdomain> <20080306112819.GC17906@elte.hu> X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: When George Bush projectile vomits antipasto on the Japanese. Message-Id: <20080306120309.E4BE52700FD@magilla.localdomain> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 04:03:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 31 > * Roland McGrath wrote: > > > The bogon came in commit eee3af4a2c83a97fff107ddc445d9df6fded9ce4, the > > introduction of the ptrace BTS stuff. Sorry I did not scour and cite > > every problem in that patch, since I had NAK'd the entire thing as > > needing more careful review and incremental introduction after 2.6.25. > > note that in -rc4 all those BTS ptrace extensions are disabled, see: I know. That completely misses the point I just made: As I said then, one of my concerns was with the low-level tweaks not yet sufficiently baked, independent from my reservations about the ptrace feature. Your #if'ing out of the user ABI additions for 2.6.25 does nothing to remove the unknown new risks from all the tweaks with fingers in the low-level arch stuff. This is the sort of thing I was concerned about. You didn't revert the parts that ever could have caused problems for anyone except those using the new ptrace extensions, i.e. changes to step.c, context switch, whatever else was touched we've lost track of now. I keep saying that those are not baked, 100% independent of the ptrace feature. You don't seem to be hearing me. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/