Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932308AbYCFNl4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:41:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752337AbYCFNlo (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:41:44 -0500 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:12246 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751523AbYCFNlm (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:41:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:41:39 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, htejun@gmail.com, bharrosh@panasas.com, efault@gmx.de, tomof@acm.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, bzolnier@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completion byte count Message-ID: <20080306134138.GF17940@kernel.dk> References: <47CEA40F.6050903@gmail.com> <20080305135121.GK6704@kernel.dk> <1204730484.3047.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080306134146A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080306134146A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2586 Lines: 53 On Thu, Mar 06 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:21:24 -0600 > James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 05 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > This is getting insanely subtle. Let's say there's PIO driver which > > > > transfer certain sized chunks at a time and completes request partially > > > > after completing each chunk and the driver uses draining to eat up > > > > whatever excess data, which seems like a legit use case to me. But it > > > > won't work because __end_that_request_first() will terminate when it > > > > reaches reaches the 'true' transfer size. That's just broken API. FWIW, > > > > > > > > Nacked-by: Tejun Heo > > > > > > Yeah, I think I may have gone a bit overboard in applying this so > > > quickly. It's just not a good interface, silently adding the extra > > > length if asked to complete more. It may even happen right now, for a > > > driver that does no padding (it probably wont do any harm here either, > > > but still). > > > > > > I'll try and see if I can come up with something cleaner. > > > > > > My basic design paradigm for this is that the _driver_ (or mid layer, if > > > SCSI wants to handle it) should care about the padding. So make it easy > > > for them to pad, but have it 'unrolled' by completion time. We should > > > NOT need any extra_len checks or additions in the block/ directory, > > > period. > > > > Right, that's why my original proposal was to do nothing for padding > > (other than ensure the driver could adjust the length if it wanted to) > > and to add an extra element always for draining, which the driver could > > ignore. It basically pushed the use paradigm onto the driver. > > > > If we want the use paradigm shared between block and driver, then I > > think the best approach is to keep all the bios the same (so not adjust > > for padding), but do adjust in the blk_rq_map_sg(). That way we have > > the padding and draining unwind information by comparing with the bio. > > Adjusting only sg in blk_rq_map_sg (like drain) looks much > better. This works with libata for me. Looks like a much better solution to me. Anyone have any valid objections against moving the padding to the sg map time? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/