Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757032AbYCFReW (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:34:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751626AbYCFReO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:34:14 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41127 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943AbYCFReO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:34:14 -0500 Message-ID: <47D02780.4060309@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:18:56 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Dewar CC: NightStrike , Olivier Galibert , Chris Lattner , Michael Matz , Richard Guenther , Joe Buck , Jan Hubicka , Aurelien Jarno , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag References: <84fc9c000803051332q2f2eedeej7d3c0509e698cabf@mail.gmail.com> <47CF11D6.7070901@zytor.com> <738B72DB-A1D6-43F8-813A-E49688D05771@apple.com> <2F47E21A-9055-4EC3-99CF-B666BBC045C3@apple.com> <47CF3F09.4080606@zytor.com> <578FCA7D-D7A6-44F6-9310-4A97C13CDCBE@apple.com> <47CF44E7.3020106@zytor.com> <20080306135139.GA5236@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <47D01457.30001@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <47D01457.30001@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1242 Lines: 28 Robert Dewar wrote: > > Sounds good, but has almost nothing to do with the real world. I > remember back in Realia COBOL days, we had to carefully copy IBM > bugs in the IBM mainframe COBOL compiler. Doing things right and > fixing the bug would have been the right thing to do, but no one > would have used Realia COBOL :-) > > Another story, the sad story of the intel chip (I think it was > the 80188) where Intel made use of Int 5, which was documented > as reserved. Unfortunately, Microsoft/IBM had used this for > print screen or some such. Intel was absolutely right that > their documentation was clear and it was wrong to have used > these interrupts .. but the result was a warehouse of unused > chips. IBM used it for print screen (and other calls), because Microsoft cassette BASIC used all the non-reserved INT instructions as byte codes (they cut it down to *only* half the interrupt vectors in the disk version.) We're still stuck with the consequences of that hack. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/