Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:29:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:29:19 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:60170 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:29:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions. To: acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:40:31 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), rth@twiddle.net (Richard Henderson), Ronald.Wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Ronald Wahl), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200201112326.g0BNQvR318985@saturn.cs.uml.edu> from "Albert D. Cahalan" at Jan 11, 2002 06:26:57 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > that are hard to defy. Don't worry about it. Intel will > never produce a new x86-compatible chip without cmov. > Nobody else will either. People already do. The C3 and C5. The fact the real world i686 definition and the compiler one differed caused much pain in the package installing department. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/