Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:45:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:45:08 -0500 Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:63499 "EHLO freeside.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:45:03 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3F950F.8010700@lexus.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:44:47 -0800 From: J Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Dukes CC: fabrizio.gennari@philips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PPP over socket? In-Reply-To: <20020112011207.F7199@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just my $.02 - vtund rocks, I learned about it when I took on a side job doing linux/vpn admin for a medium size company. vtund connects their branch offices to their main office - it encrypts and compresses traffic between the vpn boxes at each end, which in our case are iptables firewall boxes. I am impressed with it - as mentioned it's user space and works with linux, bsd or solaris.... cu jjs Chris Dukes wrote: >On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:13:57AM +0100, fabrizio.gennari@philips.com wrote: > >>I was wondering whether the socket architecture could be modified in order >>to support PPP connections over a generic socket (of type SOCK_DGRAM or >>SOCK_SEQPACKET), by mapping each PPP packet to a socket packet. This idea >>is not completely new: somebody raised is in the past, see for example >>http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/mail/netdev/msg00180.html or >>http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/mail/netdev/msg01127.html . >> > >vtun already provides this capability in user space. >(See http://vtun.sourceforge.net/) >ppp(8) on *BSD also provides this capability in user space as well. > >As memory serves PPPoE on Linux is partially implemented in userspace >as is, so a partial user space solution for PPPoUDP shouldn't be that >wretched. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/